Challenging Growth Economics

Challenging Growth Economics


Introduction What is growth? Evidence of growth The case for growth Where are we today? Are there limits to growth? Degrowth to a steady-state economy Policy considerations Questions, comments, discussion WHAT IS GROWTH?

If one is to be for or against growth it is important to know what that term means: Extensive or quantitative growth (i.e. increased energy/resource use) Intensive or qualitative growth (i.e. increased efficiency / productivity per unit of energy/resource) Increases in gross domestic product (GDP) Increases in human population Increases in wellbeing or utility These are all legitimate ways to understand growth but they are not synonymous. One form of growth may or may not lead to another form. Some forms may have limits, others may not.

GDP PER CAPITA IN HISTORY Graph from: World average GDP per capita 1500 to 2003. Data extracted from Angus Maddison's " World Population, GDP and Per Capita GDP, 1-2003 AD POPULATION GROWTH IN HISTORY Graph from: ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN HISTORY Graph from:

In this graph, the biofuels category includes all renewables. RESOURCE EXTRACTION IN HISTORY Graph from: THE CASE FOR GROWTH In conditions of material destitution it is quite understandable why getting richer in material terms is likely to contribute to increased quality of life. Furthermore, even in rich countries, money can be used to satisfy our most pressing desires. Growth in GDP is also widely considered a necessary path to poverty alleviation (a rising tide lifts all boats)

Growth in GDP can also be considered the path to environmental sustainability; that is, it will allow us to afford the best eco technologies (solar panels, efficient appliances, electric cars) and fund important environmental protection programs, etc. In short, just aim for growth and use the money to solve the problems that growth produces. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS Graphs from: and and and http:// ARE THERE LIMITS TO GROWTH?

Early critics were Malthus and J.S. Mill, but the modern movement gained momentum with the 1972 publication of Limits to Growth, sparking a controversy that has yet to subside. Why might there be limits to growth? The global economy is in gross ecological overshoot There are billions who need to develop their economic capacities in some form to attain a dignified standard of living It is expected that we will have 9.5 billion people by mid century and 11 billion by 2100. There is even evidence suggesting that high consumption lifestyles are failing to fulfil their promise of a happy and meaningful life. In light of all this should the richest nations still be pursuing growth in GDP? Could we live more on less?

In response to these challenges, there is an emerging degrowth movement argues for a process of planned contraction of energy and resources demands which would culminate in a steady state or post-growth economy. ARGUMENTS AGAINST LIMITS There are several overlapping arguments given for why the limits to growth analysis is wrong:

Markets Technological innovation Design improvements Efficiency Decoupling Green growth Returning to earlier definitions, the growth advocates argue that we can keep growing qualitatively (increase efficiency) and keep growing in terms of GDP, without growing quantitatively (move to a post-industrial, service economy). They conclude that the limits to growth school is flawed. We can and should keep pursuing GDP growth.

Coherent in theory, but what of the reality? RELATIVE DECOUPLING NOT LEADING TO ABSOLUTE DECOUPLING This graph shows that intensity is dropping (due to efficiency improvements), but overall resource extraction increasing. Graph from: MATERIAL FOOTPRINT OF NATIONS Abstract from The Material Footprints of Nations, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in the United States (2015), based on the most comprehensive economic input-output framework of the world economy. THE ARITHMETIC OF GROWTH When we read United Nations reports, or government reports, or hear the promises of politicians on the left and the right, it seems that the basic vision of global development is that the rich nations keep growing in terms of GDP and, in accordance with justice, over coming decades the poorest attain a similar standard of living, all done in a way that is magically sustainable. If the developed nations say the OECD nations grew by 2% over coming decades and by 2050 the global population had achieved a similar standard of living, the global economy would be 15 times larger than it is today (Jackson, 2009). If it grew at 3% from then on it would be 30 times larger than the current economy by 2073, and 60 times

larger by the end of this century. Note that every nation would prefer 3% growth to 2%; or 4% to 3%, etc. The exponential function exposes the fantasy of growth economics. The extent of decoupling required is just too great. CRITIQUE OF GDP GDP counts all expenditure as a contribution to good growth even if it isnt. Surely, some expenditure contributes to social wellbeing, and some doesnt. All these things are counted as positive contributions to GDP:

Cleaning up oil spill or natural disaster Cutting down old growth forests Hiring more divorce lawyers, couples living apart needing more houses, furniture, etc. Increased crime requires purchases of alarms / bars on windows More people paying for sex, more on anti-depressants, more diet pills purchased, etc. Work an extra 20 hours each per week No distinction between bikes and SUVs, solar panels or flat-screens, organic food or KFC Decline in community trust / engagement not captured, despite growth

Growth in GDP but most benefits going to top few percent We need far better indicators for progress (see, for example, the Genuine Progress Indicators and the Index for Sustainable Economic Welfare). It could well be that we are now in an age of uneconomic growth, where the costs of growth outweigh the benefits. DEGROWTH TO A STEADY STATE ECONOMY Degrowth is first and foremost a macroeconomic framework focused on the developed nations that calls for planned contraction of the energy and resource demands of the economy. Degrowth, therefore, is to be distinguished from recession, which is unplanned economic contraction. In order to reach a sustainable and just level in a world of seven billion people, the degrowth required is incompatible with continued growth in GDP (for the reasons already outlined).

Given the crudeness of GDP as a measure of progress, a degrowth transition need not reduce social wellbeing and, in fact, there are many reasons to think that a transition beyond consumer lifestyles can be in our self-interest. But this means reimagining the good life and embracing lifestyles of material sufficiency. Degrowth is phase of adjustment, not a permanent contraction. Ultimately the aim would be to reach and maintain a steady state economy that operates within the sustainable carrying capacity of the planet. There is no reason why a degrowth economy cannot learn how to use its limited resources in more efficient ways. The poorest nations on the planet need to develop their economic capacities in some form, although it is important that a new mode of development is embraced. It would be catastrophic to try to turn the global South into the global North. As the poorest nations achieve a dignified and sustainable standard of living, they too will need to stop increasing their energy and resource demands and also create a steady state economy.

I = PAT The I = PAT equation can be a useful way to understand why growth and consumption are marginalised by the growth paradigm. I = environment impact P = population A = affluence (or per capita income) T = technology (or the efficiency with which each unit of economic output is produced) Note that since population and affluence are taboo subjects that politicians dont want to touch, it follows that responding to environmental problems must be solved via technology and efficiency. But weve seen this isnt leading to reduced impacts, because efficiency improvements tend to be reinvested in more growth, more consumption.

It follows, I contend, that we need to be brave enough to confront A and P (as well as exploit appropriate technologies). As the title of this conference implores: lets talk about consumption. POLICIES FOR A POST-GROWTH ECONOMY Adopt alternative indicators to progress (e.g. genuine progress indicator) Working hour reductions to ensure full employment in a contracting economy Transition swiftly to renewable energy (paid for by carbon tax?) but just as important facilitate significant energy demand reduction Public relations campaign to promote post-consumerist lifestyles Distributive justice: if we cannot solve poverty by baking an ever-larger pie, it follows that it must be solved through redistributive policies (slicing the pie differently)

Population policies (education, family planning, free provision of contraception, and perhaps there may be a need for command-andcontrol policies dont be outraged unless you have some ideas about how to avoid the population bomb). Banking and finance reform (not my area of expertise but necessary to create systems that dont implode in the absence of growth) Many, many, many more details required to develop a full policy framework for a post-growth or degrowth economy. CLOSING COMMENT If governments are unlikely to embrace a post-growth policy agenda, it follows that the movement for change must be driven from the grassroots. What can individuals, households, and communities do to help build a post-growth economy from below? Raise awareness

and prefigure the alternative ways of life and show them to be good. To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete. Buckminster Fuller When/if the social movement gets large enough, then we must try to build new systems and structures that will replace the existing regime as it deteriorates over coming years and decades. Crisis as opportunity in an age of limits FURTHER READING Last year I published two books of collected essays on degrowth and voluntary simplicity (pdfs freely available online):

Samuel Alexander, Prosperous Descent: Crisis as Opportunity in an Age of Limits (2015) Samuel Alexander, Sufficiency Economy: Enough, for Everyone, Forever (2015) And my utopia of sufficiency: Samuel Alexander, Entropia: Life beyond Industrial Civilisation (2013) See also:

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Ethical Concerns with Autonomous Vehicles or Why your

    Ethical Concerns with Autonomous Vehicles or Why your

    In 2016, the US DOT announced a 15 point safety assessment checklist for car manufactures and researchers. To be used to encourage uniform rules for this technology; USDOT also called for states to come up with uniform policies for driverless...
  • DOGS SA Winter International FCI/CACIB Show

    DOGS SA Winter International FCI/CACIB Show

    Introduction. In accordance with the FCI/ANKC Associate Membership Agreement the ANKC is required to conduct a minimum of 2 Certificats d'Aptitude au Championnat International de Beauté (CACIB) shows per year.
  • Afterimages of  Platos Symposium

    Afterimages of Platos Symposium

    Arial MS Pゴシック Blank Presentation Afterimages of Plato's Symposium PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation ...
  • Bone Tissue  tissues and organs of the skeletal

    Bone Tissue tissues and organs of the skeletal

    Histology of Osseous Tissue. osteoblasts - bone forming cells. line up as single layer of cells under endosteum and periosteum. are nonmitotic. synthesize soft organic matter of matrix which then hardens by mineral deposition
  • How to help at home - West Lakes Academy

    How to help at home - West Lakes Academy

    earth,were. orange,build,gym. height, eye,tries, buy. because, cough. goes, though. bouy. flu fruit. ... Lots and lots of encourage and praise -a good guess is a good start and usually part of the word is being spelt or read correctly so...
  • Challenges in analyzing Spiking Networks

    Challenges in analyzing Spiking Networks

    Long term, local Hebbian learning ... Extremely small, sub micron dimensions for a synapse. Enormous amounts of memory, computation and circuitry. Digital solution uses multiple bits of memory to store each synaptic weight and synaptic state.
  • Navigating -

    Navigating -

    View your class roster in SSB and Print Picture Rosters from the UNH website. Post official grades in SSB. ... Log in with your UNH network username and password. Select the term and then find your course from the alpha-sorted...
  • 10 Steps to a Quality Lesson Plan

    10 Steps to a Quality Lesson Plan

    Command attention Anticipatory set Introduction Review of previous lesson Map Prompt questions 10 Steps to a Quality Lesson Plan 5. Write step by step procedures List relevant actions Be as specific as possible A flowchart is helpful here 10 Steps...